POLISHERE

POLISPHERE

Consider political preference: "left wing", "right wing"; "far right", "far left"... The debate is always described in linear terms, when in fact political interests can best be described spherically: "Polisphere".

Liberal and Conservative views can be graphed as a Left/Right dichotomy, but Libertarian and Socialist views cannot be described on the same line. This is because each shares core beliefs with their Left/Right counterparts. On this note, when placing the Libertarian view on top and the Socialist view below, we can reference the common interests:

1. Liberals & Libertarians agree that Education should be made available to all People and enjoy Freedom from censorship.

2. Conservatives & Libertarians agree that Money should primarily benefit the Individual earner and enjoy Freedom in global markets.

3. Conservatives & Socialists agree that Law Enforcement should primarily protect Individual property/civil rights and that the nation should provide Security for such rights.

4. Liberals & Socialists agree that basic Healthcare should be available to all People and that the nation should provide Security for such services.

As Centrists consider all these interests reasonable and constitute the "swing vote" that decides elections, their vote generally depends on where they fit in the third dimension: Access vs. Quality. Those with wealth are most concerned about the Quality of essential government services, whereas those who are impoverished are most concerned about Access to such services.

In this light, when single-issues (i.e. Abortion, Gay Rights, etc.) or third-party candidates (i.e. Ross Perot, Ralph Nader, etc.) don't decide elections, they are usually won not by pushing Left/Right or Top/Bottom positions, but by blurring the Access/Quality separation: promising both Quality and Access. At the end of the day, all voters (and Centrists in particular) seek to improve their lives and, thus, Quality of and Access to essential government services are the issues that matter the most.

Therefore, politicians can most easily be criticized for how they succeed or fail to offer Quality and Access: the Clinton Administration was celebrated for creating greater Access to sought services, while preserving Quality. Whereas, both Bush Administrations were plagued by delivering poorer Quality services, which fewer citizens could Access.

MULTIVERSE

Consider four of the great mysteries of our Universe: (1) the Big Bang; (2) Universe Acceleration; (3) Gamma Ray Bursts; and (4) Black Holes. These phenomena can be described with a new model of our Universe: "Multiverse".

Background concepts...

Big Bang: the recognized origin of our Visible Universe -- a massive explosion that spread energy strings in a large plasma cloud, which cooled to create quarks and then Hydrogen, which then coalesced to ignite as stars.

Universe Acceleration: among the great discoveries that were made by the Hubble Telescope include the observation that our Visible Universe is expanding at an ever-increasing speed.

Gamma Ray Burst (GRB): massive explosions that occur every day outside of our Visible Universe from every angle in the sky -- unlike Super Novas, which can only be seen in Visible Galaxies (typically in the Milky Way).

Black Hole: a violent stellar event at the core of every spiral galaxy, which has such gravitational force that it swallows entire galaxies and captures light -- all we can see is a Black Hole that is surrounded by doomed/spiraling stars, including the inner-most stars of our own Milky Way galaxy.

Now consider this...

What if Black Holes were not holes at all. What if they were growing Black Masses. Just as four Hydrogens (atomic weight: 1) fuse to Helium (atomic weight: 4), or seven fuse to Lithium (atomic weight: 7), a Black Mass is simply a growing element that can be cataloged at any point in time on the Periodic Chart (atomic weight: 10 to the "X").

If this were the case, then their growth would be limited only by the material that's available for consumption. Thus, after a galaxy is consumed, then another and another, barring collision by another equal or greater Black Mass, the event could grow/mature to become a Mega Mass.

Therefore, it is my proposition that GRBs are the matter liberation of Black Mass collisions and that Large GRBs are the matter liberation of Mega Mass collisions. Moreover, the Big Bang is to a Large GRB, as the Sun is to a Star: we are the product of one and the observer of the other.

Prediction: our Visible Universe accelerates faster in regions that are in closest proximity to a Mega Mass. Arc measurements of Red Shift will demonstrate a repeatable variance.

ILLUSTRATION

a. Mega Mass (or a mature Black Mass): galactic matter collapsed through fusion.
b. Mega Masses caught it each other's gravity well.
c. Mega Mass collision (Big Bang or GRB), which liberates/redistributes matter.
d. New Visible Universe evolves from liberated matter (strings to quarks to H to stars).
e. Visible Universe pulled apart by Mega Mass neighbors.
f. Mega Mass growth from captured matter (or Visible Universe remnants).